Costa-Grant v. Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.
| Katrina Costa-Grant |
| Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv10630 |
| March 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Patti B Saris |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Katrina Costa-Grant (McLane, Ryan) |
| Filing 16 STATE COURT Record. (Rodriguez, Annabel) |
| Filing 15 Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added BRIAN MEAD. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
| Filing 14 Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added EMILY STARBUCK. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at # https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
| Filing 13 Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added BARRICK BOLLMAN. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at # https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
| Filing 12 Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWED re #11 Motion for Extension of Time to answer to the Complaint. ANSWER DUE BY 4/26/2023.(Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to April 26, 2023 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by Cell Signaling Technology, Inc..(Rodriguez, Annabel) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of BRIAN MEAD Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-9787107 by Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Rodriguez, Annabel) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of EMILY STARBUCK Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-9787102 by Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Rodriguez, Annabel) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of BARRICK BOLLMAN Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-9787090 by Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Rodriguez, Annabel) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE BY VIDEO : SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SET FOR 5/15/2023 09:30 AM BY VIDEO before Judge Patti B. Saris. This hearing will be conducted by video conference. Counsel of record will receive a video conference invite at the email registered in CM/ECF. If you have technical or compatibility issues with the technology, please notify the courtroom deputy of the session as soon as possible.Access to the hearing will be made available to the media and public. In order to gain access to the hearing, you must sign up at the following address: #https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html.For questions regarding access to hearings, you may refer to the general orders and public notices of the Court available on #www.mad.uscourts.gov or contact media@mad.uscourts.gov. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
| Filing 6 Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWED re #5 Motion for Extension of Time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Answer due by 4/13/2023. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to April 13, 2023 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by Cell Signaling Technology, Inc..(Rodriguez, Annabel) |
| Filing 4 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.. (Rodriguez, Annabel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9773465 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Category Form)(Rodriguez, Annabel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
