Invoice Cloud, Inc. v. BillGO, Inc.
| Invoice Cloud, Inc. |
| BillGO, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv10704 |
| March 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Leo T Sorokin |
| Contract: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Violation of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Invoice Cloud, Inc. (Pacini, Steven) |
| Filing 26 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Cancelling Hearing. The parties have reported to the Court that the matter has resolved. Accordingly, the Motion hearing set for 4/28/2023 is cancelled. (Belmont, Kellyann) |
| Filing 25 Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Emergency Temporary Restraining Order. Responses due by 4/26/2023. Replies due by 4/27/2023. (Belmont, Kellyann) |
| Filing 24 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Resetting Hearing on Motion #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Emergency Temporary Restraining Order : Motion Hearing reset for 4/28/2023 10:00 AM in Courtroom 13 (In person only) before District Judge Leo T. Sorokin. (Belmont, Kellyann) |
| Filing 23 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re #22 Joint MOTION to Continue Hearing and Amend Briefing Schedule by Invoice Cloud, Inc, ALLOWED. (Belmont, Kellyann) |
| Filing 22 Joint MOTION to Continue Hearing and Amend Briefing Schedule by Invoice Cloud, Inc..(Pacini, Steven) |
| Filing 21 Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Emergency Temporary Restraining Order. Responses due by 4/17/2023. Replies due by 4/18/2023. (Belmont, Kellyann) |
| Filing 20 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Resetting Hearing on Motion #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Emergency Temporary Restraining Order : Motion Hearing reset for 4/19/2023 10:30 AM in Courtroom 13 (In person only) before District Judge Leo T. Sorokin. (Belmont, Kellyann) |
| Filing 19 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re #18 Joint MOTION to Continue Hrg on Plff's Mn for Preliminary Injunction to April 19, 2023 and amend briefing schedule by BillGO, Inc. ALLOWED. (Belmont, Kellyann) |
| Filing 18 Joint MOTION to Continue Hrg on Plff's Mn for Preliminary Injunction to April 19, 2023 and amend briefing schedule by BillGO, Inc..(David, Allen) |
| Filing 17 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Invoice Cloud, Inc.. BillGO, Inc. served on 4/4/2023, answer due 4/25/2023. Acknowledgement filed by Invoice Cloud, Inc.. (Pacini, Steven) |
| Filing 16 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Christopher A. Riley. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Dore, Samantha) |
| Filing 15 Assented to MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Christopher A. Riley Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-9797307 by BillGO, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Christopher A. Riley)(David, Allen) |
| Filing 14 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: New Civil Cases Procedural ORDER entered.(Dore, Samantha) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Allen N. David on behalf of BillGO, Inc. (David, Allen) |
| Filing 12 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Setting Hearing on Motion #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Emergency Temporary Restraining Order : Motion Hearing set for 4/14/2023 10:00 AM in Courtroom 13 (In person only) before District Judge Leo T. Sorokin. (Belmont, Kellyann) |
| Filing 11 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re #10 Emergency MOTION for an Expedited Hearing and Briefing Schedule re 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Emergency Temporary Restraining Order by Invoice Cloud, Inc. The Motion for emergency relief is ALLOWED. The Court will hold a hearing on the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction on Friday April 14 at 10:00 a.m. Any opposition to the Motion is due Tuesday April 11th and any reply limited to five pages by Wednesday April 12. (Belmont, Kellyann) |
| Filing 10 Emergency MOTION for an Expedited Hearing and Briefing Schedule re #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Emergency Temporary Restraining Order by Invoice Cloud, Inc..(Trach, William) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Steven J. Pacini in Support re #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Emergency Temporary Restraining Order filed by Invoice Cloud, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Trach, William) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Steven J. Schult in Support re #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Emergency Temporary Restraining Order filed by Invoice Cloud, Inc.. (Trach, William) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Emergency Temporary Restraining Order filed by Invoice Cloud, Inc.. (Trach, William) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Emergency Temporary Restraining Order by Invoice Cloud, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Preliminary Injunction, #2 Proposed Temporary Restraining Order)(Trach, William) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven J. Pacini on behalf of Invoice Cloud, Inc. (Pacini, Steven) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to BillGO, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Invoice Cloud, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Hancock Midco, LLC, Other Affiliate EngageSmart, Inc. for Invoice Cloud, Inc... (Trach, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BillGO, Inc. Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9786538 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Invoice Cloud, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - News Article, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Category Form)(Trach, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Invoice Cloud, Inc. v. BillGO, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Invoice Cloud, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Steven J. Pacini |
| Represented By: | William J. Trach |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BillGO, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Christopher A. Riley |
| Represented By: | Allen N. David |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
