Jeong et al v. Jaddou et al
| Deukyoung Jeong and Kai Tsir Yap |
| Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 1:2023cv10742 |
| April 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| William G Young |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #13 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 08/15/2023 to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Ur Mendoza Jaddou answer due 8/15/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas answer due 8/15/2023. (Gaudet, Jennifer) |
| Filing 13 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 08/15/2023 to File Answer to the Complaint by Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas.(Farquhar, Rayford) |
| Filing 12 Notice of correction to docket made by Court staff. Correction: Docket Entry #7 Summons Returned Executed Corrected Because: Counsel Goldstein Filed the Returns of Service Under the Wrong Events in CM/ECF NextGen and Entered the Wrong Service Date as to U.S. Attorney Rachael Rollins. (Paine, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, by Deukyoung Jeong, Kai Tsir Yap. (Paine, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney General - Merrick Garland by Deukyoung Jeong, Kai Tsir Yap. (Paine, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Alejandro Mayorkas, by Deukyoung Jeong, Kai Tsir Yap. (Paine, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney - Rachael Rollins served on 4/12/2023, answer due 6/12/2023 by Deukyoung Jeong, Kai Tsir Yap.. (Paine, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney by Deukyoung Jeong, Kai Tsir Yap. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 4/11/2023, answer due 6/12/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 4/11/2023, answer due 6/12/2023. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Rayford A. Farquhar on behalf of Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas (Farquhar, Rayford) |
Filing 5
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (de Oliveira, Flaviana)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge William G. Young assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Injunctive Relief and Petition for Writ of Mandamus against Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9795447 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Deukyoung Jeong, Kai Tsir Yap. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
