Lu v. Kastner et al
| Friedrich Lu |
| Paul V Kastner, Kastner Realty Trust, Enright and Jody L Goodman Dinan |
| 1:2023cv10951 |
| May 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Allison D Burroughs |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Plaintiff's motion to issue summons and extend time to serve, [ECF No. #8 ], is ALLOWED. The Court is informed that the summonses were previously mailed to the Plaintiff at his address of record on May 1, 2023. The mail was not returned as undeliverable, and it is the Plaintiff's responsibility to provide a valid address of record. Nevertheless, the Clerk is directed to mail Plaintiff the materials previously mailed to him on May 1, 2023. The time to serve all defendants is extended to September 21, 2023. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall, as part of its response due on June 30, 2023 to defendant Enright's Motion to Dismiss [ECF Nos. #6 & #7 ], show cause why Plaintiff not be sanctioned with dismissal of this action against all defendants for failure to comply with Judge Wolf's March 29, 2022 Order in Lu v. Harvard University et al., Civ. No. 00-cv-11492, a copy of which can be found on the docket for this action at ECF No. 7-2. (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Issue Summons and Reset Time to Serve Summons by Friedrich Lu. (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Enright. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Welsh, Brian) |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Enright. Attachments deleted on 6/16/2023 as refiled properly by attorney at ECF No. #7 (McManus, Caetlin). |
| Filing 5 Filing fee/payment: $ 402.00, receipt number 100003454 for #1 Complaint (Barbosa, Nilsa) |
| Filing 4 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's check, dated October 22, 2022, which he submitted to pay the filing fee. The check cannot be processed because it is more than six months old. Plaintiff must submit a current check, dated within the last sixth months, to pay the filing fee. If Plaintiff does not submit a current check within 21 days, this matter will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay filing fee. (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Enright, Jody L Goodman Dinan, Paul V Kastner, Kastner Realty Trust. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Horvath, Courtney) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Enright, Kastner Realty Trust, Paul V Kastner, Jody L Goodman Dinan, filed by Friedrich Lu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Horvath, Courtney) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
