Pimentel v. Amguard Insurance Company
| Awilda Pimentel |
| Amguard Insurance Company |
| 1:2023cv11005 |
| May 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| F Dennis Saylor |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Amended CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (Casey, Tyler) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (O'Connor, David) |
| Filing 11 JOINT STATEMENT re scheduling conference . (Casey, Tyler) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (Casey, Tyler) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling Conference set for 7/12/2023 03:20 PM by telephone before Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV. (Attachments: #1 Template for Scheduling Order)(McKillop, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Amguard Insurance Company.(O'Connor, David) |
| Filing 7 STATE COURT Record Amguard Insurance Company summons served on 4/18/2023, answer due 5/9/2023.. (O'Connor, David) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Seth H. Hochbaum on behalf of Awilda Pimentel (Hochbaum, Seth) |
| Filing 5 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Amguard Insurance Company. (O'Connor, David) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel shall refile their Corporate Disclosure Statement as its own entry with an updated header for this court pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7.1. Please use the Corporate Disclosure Statement event in Civil Events for filing. (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9843530 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Removal to Plaintiff Counsel, #4 Civil Cover Sheet D - Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit E - Corporate Disclosure Statement, #6 Category Form F - Category Form, #7 Exhibit G - Notice of Removal to State Court)(O'Connor, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pimentel v. Amguard Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Awilda Pimentel | |
| Represented By: | Tyler O. Casey |
| Represented By: | Seth H. Hochbaum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amguard Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | David M. O'Connor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
