Duarte v. Frane et al
Eric J. Duarte |
Danielle Frane, Chris Dawly and Jimmy Graham |
1:2023cv11009 |
May 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Nathaniel M Gorton |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eric J. Duarte. (Attachments: #1 Resident Account Summary, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Affidavit, #4 Copy of ECF #4 Order) (Warnock, Douglas) |
Filing 4 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. Procedural Order regarding resolution of filling fee. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff must respond within 21 days. (Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eric J. Duarte.(Currie, Haley) |
Filing 1 Petition to redress deprivation of rights and grievances, access to courts being denied pursuant to United States Constitution Amendment #1 against All Defendants, filed by Eric J. Duarte. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit List, #3 State Court Document, #4 Envelope)(Currie, Haley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.