Jeannite v. Shuuhan
| Joel Jeannite |
| Shuahan and Shuuhan |
| 1:2023cv11022 |
| May 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Angel Kelley |
| Indira Talwani |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Joel Jeannite (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 10 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE(PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 9 Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE. On June 9, 2023, plaintiff Joel Jeannite was ordered to file an amended complaint by June 16, 2023. See Order, Doc. No. 7. On June 20, 2023, the copy of this order mailed to Jeannite at the address he provided the court was returned as undeliverable. See Doc. No. 8. Nothing further has been filed by Jeannite in this action. Local Rule 83.5.5(h) provides that "Every party appearing pro se shall inform the clerk and all parties in writing of any change of name, address, telephone number, or e-mail address within 14 days of the change. It is the responsibility of the pro se party to notify the clerk and the parties of any change. Any notice sent by the clerk... to a pro se party shall be deemed delivered and properly served if sent to the most recent address or e-mail address provided by the pro se party." Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to keep the court apprised of Jeannite's address and failing to comply with the Court's June 9, 2023 Order. The Clerk is directed to enter a separate order of dismissal without prejudice and shall provide Jeannite with a copy of this order if he appears at the Clerk's Office and so requests.(PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Joel Jeannite (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 7 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Jeannite shall, by June 16, 2023, file an amended complaint that complies with the basic pleading requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 6 Copy of 4 Order and docket sheet mailed to Joel Jeannite on 6/8/2023. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Judge Indira Talwani added. District Judge Angel Kelley no longer assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 4 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE ENTERED. Because civil cases that are related under Local Rule 40.1(g) are to be assigned to the same district judge, and a related case that has not been treated as such at the time of filing may be transferred to the judge to whom it should be assigned, pursuant to Local Rule 40.1(i)(1), the Court orders that this action be reassigned as related to Jeannite v Tyrone, 23-11021-IT. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Angel Kelley assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joel Jeannite.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shuahan, filed by Joel Jeannite. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
