Smith v. PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC et al
Plaintiff: John E. Smith
Defendant: PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc. and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC
Case Number: 1:2023cv11124
Filed: May 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Nathaniel M Gorton
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2023 Filing 8 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. ORDER OF REMAND to the State Court (Warnock, Douglas)
May 31, 2023 Filing 7 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered DENIED as moot #4 Emergency MOTION to Remand to State Court by John E. Smith. (Warnock, Douglas)
May 31, 2023 Filing 6 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWING #5 Assented to MOTION to Withdraw #1 Notice of Removal, . (Warnock, Douglas)
May 30, 2023 Filing 5 Assented to MOTION to Withdraw #1 Notice of Removal, by PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc..(Bresnahan, Elizabeth)
May 22, 2023 Filing 4 Emergency MOTION to Remand to State Court by John E. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3)(Kelley, Walter)
May 19, 2023 Filing 3 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by mail (Phillips, Sophie)
May 19, 2023 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary)
May 19, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number CMADC-9864698 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Category Form)(Bresnahan, Elizabeth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John E. Smith
Represented By: Walter Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Philips Holding USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC
Represented By: Elizabeth M. Bresnahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?