Utah-Idaho Teamsters Security Fund v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
| Utah-Idaho Teamsters Security Fund |
| Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and Norton (Waterford) Ltd. |
| 1:2023cv11198 |
| May 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Nathaniel M Gorton |
| Paul G Levenson |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Reassignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 9 Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. . (Groopman, Steven) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Utah-Idaho Teamsters Security Fund. Norton (Waterford) Ltd. waiver sent on 7/20/2023, answer due 10/18/2023. (LaSalle, Kristie) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Utah-Idaho Teamsters Security Fund. Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. waiver sent on 7/20/2023, answer due 9/18/2023. (LaSalle, Kristie) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Utah-Idaho Teamsters Security Fund. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. waiver sent on 7/20/2023, answer due 10/18/2023. (LaSalle, Kristie) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristie A. LaSalle on behalf of Utah-Idaho Teamsters Security Fund (LaSalle, Kristie) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Utah-Idaho Teamsters Security Fund. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. waiver sent on 7/20/2023, answer due 9/18/2023. (LaSalle, Kristie) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Norton (Waterford) Ltd., Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9876557 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Utah-Idaho Teamsters Security Fund. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Groopman, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
