Knight et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Alphonse Knight and Olive Knight |
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and John Doe Corporation |
1:2023cv11221 |
May 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Paul G Levenson |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by David L. Ayers on behalf of Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (Ayers, David) |
Filing 11 Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added David L. Ayers. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at # https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Dumoulin, Rose) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of David Ayers Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-9909919 by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of David L. Ayers in Support of Motion for Admission pro hac vice)(Schaffer, Michelle) |
Filing 9 Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. . (Schaffer, Michelle) |
Filing 8 STATE COURT Record. (Schaffer, Michelle) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc..(Schaffer, Michelle) |
Filing 6 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (McManus, Caetlin) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Toyota Motor Corporation, Corporate Parent Toyota Motor North America, Inc. for Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc... (Schaffer, Michelle) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle M. Byers on behalf of Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (Byers, Michelle) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle I. Schaffer on behalf of Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (Schaffer, Michelle) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9881350 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Complaint & Summons, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Notice of Removal - State Court, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Category Form)(Schaffer, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.