Epson America, Inc. v. Shenzhen Holatek Co., Ltd.
| Epson America, Inc. |
| Shenzhen Holatek Co., Ltd. doing business as JmGo Direct, Amazon Seller ID AEKXPNJXZCW6Xs |
| 1:2023cv11419 |
| June 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Rya W Zobel |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Judge Rya W. Zobel: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to 9/14/2023 to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint, #1 Complaint, Shenzhen Holatek Co., Ltd. answer due 9/14/2023. (Urso, Lisa) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to 9/14/2023 to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Epson America, Inc..(Nickerson, Morgan) |
| Filing 6 Judge Rya W. Zobel: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting (5) Motion alternate service in case 1:23-cv-11367-RWZ; granting (5) Motion alternate service in case 1:23-cv-11419-RWZ Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-11367-RWZ, 1:23-cv-11419-RWZ(Urso, Lisa) |
| Filing 5 MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE OF PROCESS by Epson America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Order, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Order, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Order)(Nickerson, Morgan) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Shenzhen Holatek Co., Ltd.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Dore, Samantha) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Rya W. Zobel assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 2 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING PATENT OR TRADEMARK. (Nickerson, Morgan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shenzhen Holatek Co., Ltd. d/b/a JmGo Direct, Amazon Seller ID AEKXPNJXZCW6X Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9919355 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Epson America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Nickerson, Morgan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Epson America, Inc. v. Shenzhen Holatek Co., Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Epson America, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Morgan T. Nickerson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Shenzhen Holatek Co., Ltd. doing business as JmGo Direct, Amazon Seller ID AEKXPNJXZCW6Xs | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
