Ritrovato v. The Charles Schwab Corporation et al
| Nicholas A Ritrovato, III |
| The Charles Schwab Corporation and Erica Gould |
| 1:2023cv11437 |
| June 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Denise J Casper |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Letter/request (non-motion) from Nicholas A Ritrovato. (Dore, Samantha) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nicholas A Ritrovato, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 5 Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. Procedural Order regarding resolution of filing fee. Plaintiff must respond within 21 days. (PSSA, 3) |
| Filing 4 Court Copy of Subpoena by Nicholas A Ritrovato, III (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 3 Request of clerk's signature and court seal for service by the Marshals from Nicholas A. Ritrovato. (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Nicholas A Ritrovato, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Category)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
