Pegasystems Inc. v. Appian Corporation
| Pegasystems Inc. |
| Appian Corporation |
| 1:2023cv11776 |
| August 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Leo T Sorokin |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages, Doc. No. #18 , is allowed. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, Doc. No. #9 , is dismissed as moot. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, Doc. No. #19 , remains pending. (Dore, Samantha) |
| Filing 21 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #20 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #19 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18A, #19 Exhibit 18B, #20 Exhibit 19A, #21 Exhibit 19B, #22 Exhibit 20, #23 Exhibit 21, #24 Exhibit 22, #25 Exhibit 23)(Madden, Timothy) |
| Filing 20 MEMORANDUM in Support re #19 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Appian Corporation. (Madden, Timothy) |
| Filing 19 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Appian Corporation.(Madden, Timothy) |
| Filing 18 Assented to MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Appian Corporation.(Madden, Timothy) |
| Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Appian Corporation, filed by Pegasystems Inc..(Hosp, Richard) |
| Filing 16 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered: re #15 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to September 15, 2023 to Respond to Defendant Appian Corporation's Motion to Dismiss. ALLOWED. (Dore, Samantha) |
| Filing 15 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to September 15, 2023 to Respond to Defendant Appian Corporation's Motion to Dismiss by Pegasystems Inc..(Hosp, Richard) Modified on 8/28/2023: Updated docketing event. (Dore, Samantha). |
| Filing 14 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered: re #8 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. ALLOWED. Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Dore, Samantha) |
| Filing 13 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: New Civil Cases General Procedural ORDER entered.(Dore, Samantha) |
| Filing 12 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Adeel A. Mangi, Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, Jonah M. Knobler and Clinton W. Morrison. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at # https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Dore, Samantha) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Adeel A. Mangi filed by Appian Corporation. (Attachments: #1 1, #2 2, #3 3, #4 4, #5 5, #6 6, #7 7, #8 8, #9 9, #10 10, #11 11, #12 12, #13 13, #14 14A, #15 14B, #16 15, #17 16, #18 17, #19 18)(Madden, Timothy) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Appian Corporation. (Madden, Timothy) |
| Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Appian Corporation.(Madden, Timothy) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Appian Corporation.(Madden, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 Assented to MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Adeel A. Mangi, Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, Jonah M. Knobler and Clinton W. Morrison Filing fee: $ 500, receipt number AMADC-9999344 by Appian Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D)(Madden, Timothy) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Appian Corporation. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Phillips, Sophie) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Cowan, Nicole) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Caroline K. Simons on behalf of Pegasystems Inc. (Simons, Caroline) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark S. Puzella on behalf of Pegasystems Inc. (Puzella, Mark) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Pegasystems Inc.. (Hosp, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Appian Corporation Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9975264 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Pegasystems Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, #3 Summons)(Hosp, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
