Francis v. Peabody Properties, Inc. et al
Raynel Francis |
Peabody Properties, Inc., Melville Properties LP, Penny brady and Erica Hill |
1:2023cv11783 |
August 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Myong J Joun |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Raynel Francis. Penny Brady waiver sent on 8/8/2023, answer due 10/10/2023. (Perdigao, Brittany) |
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Raynel Francis. Melville Properties LP waiver sent on 8/8/2023, answer due 10/10/2023. (Perdigao, Brittany) |
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Raynel Francis. Peabody Properties, Inc. waiver sent on 8/8/2023, answer due 10/10/2023. (Perdigao, Brittany) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Raynel Francis. Erica Hill waiver sent on 8/8/2023, answer due 10/10/2023. (Perdigao, Brittany) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J. Mazurczak on behalf of Peabody Properties, Inc. (Mazurczak, Michael) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Warnock, Douglas) |
Filing 7 USMS SERVICE INSTRUCTIONS NOTICE (PSSA, 5) |
Filing 6 Judge Myong J. Joun: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 3) is ALLOWED. The Clerk shall issue summonses. The plaintiff may elect to have service made by the United States Marshal Service. If directed by the plaintiff to do so, the United States Marshal shall serve the summonses, complaint, and this Order upon the defendants, in the manner directed by the plaintiff, with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. Notwithstanding Local Rule 4.1, the plaintiff shall have 90 days from the date of this Order to complete service. The plaintiff is responsible for providing the United States Marshals Service with all necessary papers for service. Please note, Form USM 285 can be obtained from the Clerk's office or at https://www.usmarshals.gov/process/usm285.pdf.(PSSA, 5) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Myong J. Joun assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Phillips, Sophie) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Brittany L. Perdigao on behalf of Raynel Francis. (Cook, Savannah) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raynel Francis.(Horvath, Courtney) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel shall complete and file in PDF format a Local Category Form. The form can be found on the court's website under Resources/Forms. Counsel will use the event under Other Documents- Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet. (Horvath, Courtney) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Peabody Properties, Inc., Erica Hill, Penny brady, Melville Properties LP (Fee Status: IFP requested), filed by Raynel Francis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Action Cover Sheet)(Perdigao, Brittany) Modified on 8/4/2023: Refiled fee waiver and notice of appearance as separate entries. (Horvath, Courtney) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.