RAS Trust v. The 3M Company et al
RAS Trust |
The 3M Company, AGC, Inc., Raytheon Thechnologies Corporation, Minnesota Mining and Manufactoring Co., Angus Fire, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Asahi Glass Co., Archroma Management LLC, Archroma U.S. Inc., Arkema Inc., BASF Corporation, Buckeye Fire Protection Co., Carrier Global Corporation, ChemDesign Products Inc., Chemguard, Inc., Chemicals, Inc., Chubb Fire, LTD., Clariant Corp., Corteva, Inc., Deepwater Chemicals, Inc., Doe Defendants, John 1-49, Dupont De Nemours Inc., Dynax Corp., E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Company, Kidde PLC Inc., National Foam, Inc., Nation Ford Chemicals Company, United Technologies Corporation, The Ansul Company, The Chemours Company, The Chemours Company FC, LLC, Tyco Fire Products, LP and UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation |
1:2023cv11842 |
August 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Donald L Cabell |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Electronic notice to counsel: This civil action has been transferred to the District of South Carolina and assigned civil case number 2:23-cv-04539. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 9 Case transferred to the District of South Carolina pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order entered by the MDL Panel on 150. Case file electronically extracted to the Clerk in that district. (Belpedio, Lisa) |
Filing 8 Certified copy of MDL Conditional Transfer Order number 150 in MDL Case 2873 received from the District of South Carolina requesting transfer of case for consolidated pretrial proceedings. (Belpedio, Lisa) |
Filing 7 STATE COURT Record. (Jeffrey, Jessica) |
Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #5 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Or Other Responsive Pleadings by Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products, LP. (Russo, Noreen) |
Filing 5 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Or Other Responsive Pleadings by Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products, LP.(Jeffrey, Jessica) |
Filing 4 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email. (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Horvath, Courtney) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products, LP. (Jeffrey, Jessica) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products, LP ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9988742 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Category Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jeffrey, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.