New Balance Athletics, Inc. v. Golden Goose USA, Inc.
New Balance Athletics, Inc. |
Golden Goose USA, Inc. |
1:2023cv11898 |
August 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
William G Young |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by New Balance Athletics, Inc.. Golden Goose USA, Inc. waiver sent on 9/21/2023, answer due 11/20/2023. (Puzella, Mark) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Ashlie S. Smith on behalf of New Balance Athletics, Inc. (Smith, Ashlie) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel shall complete and file in PDF format a Report on Filing or Determination Re: Patent or Trademark AO 120. The form can be found on the court's website under Resources/Forms/Local Forms. Counsel will use the event under Other Documents - Report on the filing of patent/trademark case. (Phillips, Sophie) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Golden Goose USA, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Phillips, Sophie) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge William G. Young assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (Cowan, Nicole) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard David Hosp on behalf of New Balance Athletics, Inc. (Hosp, Richard) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by New Balance Athletics, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent New Balance, Inc. for New Balance Athletics, Inc... (Puzella, Mark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Golden Goose USA, Inc. Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9999299 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by New Balance Athletics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Civil Cover Sheet, #22 Category Form, #23 Summons)(Puzella, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: New Balance Athletics, Inc. v. Golden Goose USA, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: New Balance Athletics, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Mark S. Puzella |
Represented By: | Richard David Hosp |
Represented By: | Ashlie S. Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Golden Goose USA, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.