Carr v. Department of Children and Families et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Carr
Defendant: Department of Children and Families, Beth Amoroso and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Case Number: 1:2023cv11980
Filed: August 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: F Dennis Saylor
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2023 Filing 6 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered denying (11) Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; denying (12) Emergency Motion; denying (13) Motion for access to 401k; denying (14) Motion for Order in case 1:23-cv-11974-FDS. This ruling does not prevent plaintiff from seeking permission from the First Circuit to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(5). Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-11974-FDS, 1:23-cv-11980-FDS(PSSA, 4)
August 31, 2023 Filing 5 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE(PSSA, 4)
August 31, 2023 Filing 4 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. Plaintiff Daniel Carr, who is proceeding pro se, has brought two actions in this court, which have been consolidated into a single proceeding. 1. The Motions for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis are GRANTED; 2. The complaints are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), (iii); and 3. The remaining motions are DENIED as moot. (PSSA, 4)
August 28, 2023 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (Cook, Savannah)
August 28, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daniel Carr.(Castilla, Francis)
August 28, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Daniel Carr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Category Form)(Castilla, Francis)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carr v. Department of Children and Families et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Carr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Children and Families
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beth Amoroso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?