Ortiz v. Saba University School of Medicine et al
Natalia Ortiz |
Saba University School of Medicine and R3 Education, Inc. |
1:2023cv12002 |
August 30, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
William G Young |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret Siller on behalf of Natalia Ortiz (Siller, Margaret) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander Elson on behalf of Natalia Ortiz (Elson, Alexander) |
Filing 9 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Margaret M. Siller. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at # https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Paine, Matthew) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Natalia Ortiz. R3 Education, Inc. waiver sent on 9/5/2023, answer due 11/6/2023. (Egan, Patrick) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Natalia Ortiz. Saba University School of Medicine waiver sent on 9/5/2023, answer due 11/6/2023. (Egan, Patrick) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Margaret M. Siller Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10024859 by Natalia Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification)(Egan, Patrick) |
Filing 5 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Alexander Elson. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Gaudet, Jennifer) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Alexander Elson Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10017938 by Natalia Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification)(Egan, Patrick) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Cowan, Nicole) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge William G. Young assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Cook, Savannah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against R3 Education, Inc., Saba University School of Medicine Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-10014761 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Natalia Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5)(Egan, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.