Silvestro v. Lyft, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Nicole Silvestro
Defendant: Lyft, Inc. and Barry Sita
Case Number: 1:2023cv12170
Filed: September 22, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: George A OToole
Referring Judge: Richard G Stearns
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2023 Filing 14 Copy of certified case file mailed to Suffolk County Superior Court on 10/20/2023. (Pacho, Arnold)
October 20, 2023 Filing 13 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. Order of Remand to the Suffolk County Superior Court. (Pacho, Arnold)
October 20, 2023 Filing 12 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #11 Assented-to Motion to Remand to State Court. (Pacho, Arnold)
October 19, 2023 Filing 11 Assented to MOTION to Remand to State Court by Lyft, Inc..(O'Leary, Matthew)
October 17, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE by Lyft, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal Certificate of Filing of State Court Record (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certified State Court Record)(O'Leary, Matthew)
October 10, 2023 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Barry Sita.(Healy, Robert)
October 10, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert W. Healy on behalf of Barry Sita (Healy, Robert)
October 4, 2023 Filing 7 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered - Defendant Lyft, Inc. having filed its Answer, the court orders the following pretrial schedule:Initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) must be completed by 11/3/23. Motions for leave to Amend Pleadings & Joinder of Parties must be filed by 1/30/24. Without leave of court, the parties are permitted to serve 30 interrogatories, 30 requests for admissions and 30 document requests, to be served on the opposing parties (their counsel) within the 30 days of the initial disclosures (by 12/4/23). The court expects responses to be made in thirty days, unless a request for additional time is granted. A party may not notice more than 4 depositions without leave of court on a showing of good cause.If the parties would like to participate in the court's mediation program, they must notify docket clerk Arnold Pacho (617-748-9812) by 3/25/24. All fact discovery must be completed no later than 4/5/24. If dispositive motions are appropriate, they are due by 4/29/24, with Oppositions to dispositive motions due 5/20/24; Reply, if any, by leave of court. The court notes that, in this session, treating physicians are not required to produce Rule 26 expert reports, rather plaintiff's relevant medical records are produced as part of fact discovery. This responsibility can also be accomplished by plaintiff presenting completed releases for relevant records and providers by 11/3/23 as part of her automatic disclosures. Plaintiff is obligated to supplement these records under the procedural rules with any relevant ongoing treatment.If the parties intend to utilize expert(s) (other than treating physicians who have produced their relevant records) they must inform the court no later than 3/25/24 for the court to consider whether the experts' expected testimony comports with Fed. R. Evid. 702 and then to amend the pretrial schedule. (Zierk, Marsha)
September 29, 2023 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Lyft, Inc..(O'Leary, Matthew)
September 28, 2023 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns added. Judge George A. OToole, Jr no longer assigned to case. (Cook, Savannah)
September 28, 2023 Filing 4 Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. ORDER OF RECUSAL. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455, I recuse myself from participation in this matter and direct the Clerk to reassign the case randomly. (de Oliveira, Flaviana)
September 22, 2023 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge George A. OToole, Jr assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Cowan, Nicole)
September 22, 2023 Filing 2 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by mail (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
September 22, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Lyft, Inc. ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-10049328 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Category Form)(O'Leary, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Silvestro v. Lyft, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Silvestro
Represented By: Robert C. Shea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lyft, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew Mackay O'Leary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barry Sita
Represented By: Robert W. Healy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?