Goldstein v. SUR Construction Services, Corp.
Plaintiff: Nathan P. Goldstein, as he is Executive Director, Massachusetts Laborers' Benefit Funds and Nathan P. Goldstein
Defendant: SUR Construction Services, Corp.
Case Number: 1:2023cv12296
Filed: October 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Paul G Levenson
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed SUR Construction Services, Corp. served on 10/20/2023, answer due 11/13/2023. (Gillin, Sasha)
October 19, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Sophie C. Esquier on behalf of Nathan P. Goldstein (Esquier, Sophie)
October 6, 2023 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SUR Construction Services, Corp.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Pacho, Arnold)
October 6, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Cowan, Nicole)
October 5, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SUR Construction Services, Corp. Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-10072831 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Nathan P. Goldstein, as he is Executive Director, Massachusetts Laborers' Benefit Funds. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet)(Gillin, Sasha)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goldstein v. SUR Construction Services, Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan P. Goldstein, as he is Executive Director, Massachusetts Laborers' Benefit Funds
Represented By: Sasha N. Gillin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan P. Goldstein
Represented By: Sasha N. Gillin
Represented By: Sophie C. Esquier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SUR Construction Services, Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?