McAdam v. Progress Software Corporation
| Annie McAdam |
| Progress Software Corporation |
| 1:2023cv12350 |
| October 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Allison D Burroughs |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF MDL CASE CLOSED, Direct file in the District of Massachusetts; McAdam v. Progress Software Corporation. In Re: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL 3083. (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 21 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. MDL Order No. 1 (General Provisions) Associated Cases: 1:23-md-03083-ADB et al. (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Annie McAdam (Dugan, James) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL: Pursuant to Transfer Order from MDL Panel dated 10/4/2023 case number: 2:23-cv-02295 from the Eastern District of Louisiana has been transferred and assigned civil action number: 1:23-cv-12350. In Re: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL 3083 (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 18 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 17 Case transferred in from District of Louisiana Eastern; Case Number 2:23-cv-02295. |
Filing 16
Order of MDL Transfer to District of Massachusetts. MDL case number is 3083. Electronic file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter)(my)
|
| Filing 15 Transfer Order from MDL Panel regarding MDL 3083. (my) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting in part #13 Motion to Extend Stay of proceedings. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART. The stay is extended to Wednesday, November 1, 2023. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 09/12/2023. (cs)
|
| Filing 13 EXPARTE/CONSENT Joint MOTION for Extension of to Stay Proceedings by Progress Software Corporation and Annie McAdam. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bogart, Kelly) Modified filer/text on 9/12/2023 (cs). |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 08/15/2023. (cs)
|
| Filing 11 EXPARTE/CONSENT Joint MOTION to Stay by Progress Software Corporation and Annie McAdam. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)Attorney Kelly Cambre Bogart added to party Progress Software Corporation(pty:dft).(Bogart, Kelly) Modified text on 8/15/2023 (cs). |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Progress Software Corporation served on 7/24/2023, answer due 8/14/2023. (Dugan, James) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF RESPONSE AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO TRANSFER RELATED CASESFOR CENTRALIZED PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C 8 1407 filed by Annie McAdam in MDL 3083. (my) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to TerriAnne Benedetto.. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 07/14/2023. (Attachments: #1 PHV Notice) (js)
|
| Filing 7 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Fee previously paid). 1) Document contains incorrect Section and/or Magistrate Judge. All future pleadings must reflect Section E Judge Susie Morgan and Magistrate Judge (2) Donna Phillips Currault. 2) Proposed Order should be added as a separate attachment to the motion and not as part of the motion. Clerk took corrective action. No further action is necessary. 3) Filing attorney incorrectly changed 'N' to 'Y' at the question 'Is this motion to be decided by the Magistrate Judge Y/N?'. This motion will be decided by the District Judge. Clerk took corrective action. 4) Filing attorney should have selected 'Yes' at the question 'Is this an Exparte/Consent Motion Y/N?'. Exparte/Consent Motions are not set for submission. Clerk modified docket text to reflect 'Exparte' and remove submission date. (cs) |
| Filing 6 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Terrianne Benedetto (Fee previously paid) by Annie McAdam. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Affidavit, #3 Consent to Electronic Filing)(Dugan, James) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/14/2023: #4 Proposed Order) (cs). Modified text/image on 7/14/2023 (cs). |
| Filing 5 DEFICIENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-10019609) by Annie McAdam. Motion(s) referred to Donna Phillips Currault. Motion(s) will be submitted on 7/10/2023. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Consent to Electronic filing)(Dugan, James) Modified text on 7/11/2023 (cs). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: It has been brought to the court's attention that the above captioned matter is related to Civil Action No. 23-2089, Berry v. Progress Software Corporation previously allotted to Section "E" (2) of this Court. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is hereby transferred to Section "E" (2) for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 7/6/23.(cg)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Progress Software Corporation. (cg) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (kls) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-10009282) filed by Annie McAdam. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney James R. Dugan, II added to party Annie McAdam(pty:pla).(Dugan, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
