McPherson v. UNUM Group et al
Francis W. McPherson |
Unum Group and Progress Software Corporation |
1:2023cv12411 |
October 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Allison D Burroughs |
Contract: Other |
15 U.S.C. ยง 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. MDL Order No. 1 (General Provisions) Associated Cases: 1:23-md-03083-ADB et al. (McManus, Caetlin) |
Filing 18 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #16 Motion to Stay proceedings. (Folan, Karen) |
Filing 17 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #14 Motion to Stay proceedings for 30 days. (Folan, Karen) |
Filing 16 MOTION to Stay Proceedings (Unopposed) by Progress Software Corporation.(Forni, Eric) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric A. Forni on behalf of Progress Software Corporation (Forni, Eric) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Stay Unopposed Motion to Stay Proceedings for Thirty Days by Unum Group.(Fuller, Anthony) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Kayla Ghantous on behalf of Unum Group (Ghantous, Kayla) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony E. Fuller on behalf of Unum Group (Fuller, Anthony) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL: Pursuant to CTO Number 1 entered in MDL No. 3083, Western District of Michigan case number 1:23-cv-01005 has been transferred to the District of Massachusetts and assigned civil action number: 1:23-cv-12411. In Re: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL 3083 (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 10 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 9 Case transferred in from District of Michigan Western; Case Number 1:23-cv-01005. |
Filing 8 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation; certified copy received from District of Massachusetts; case transferred to District of Massachusetts under MDL No. 3083, IN RE: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach (ns) |
Filing 7 COPY of CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation directed to the District of Massachusetts regarding case to be transferred to the Multidistrict Litigation Panel under MDL No. 3083, IN RE: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach (ns) |
Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE re Notice (Other), #5 submitted by Jeffrey Tsai (regarding service copy) (mg) Modified text on 10/4/2023 (mg). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of related actions regarding MDL #3083 (service copy) (Attachments: #1 Attachment A -schedule of actions, #2 Exhibit 1 - docket for USDC MA 23-12157, #3 Exhibit 2 -docket for USDC MI 23-1005, #4 Exhibit 3- docket for USDC MA 23-12156) (mg) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Progress Software Corporation, UNUM Group (ns) |
Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Paul L. Maloney ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re filing fee (mg) |
SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants Progress Software Corporation, UNUM Group (filing fee not paid) (mg) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Francis W. McPherson in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-7170385 (Oliver, Alyson) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Oliver, Alyson) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Progress Software Corporation, UNUM Group filed by Francis McPherson (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Oliver, Alyson) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.