Silva v. MAYORKAS et al
Carlos Silva |
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Patrick Lechleitner, Mr. Todd Lyons, Antone Moniz and Joseph McDonald |
1:2023cv12502 |
October 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Paul G Levenson |
Richard G Stearns |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for Reconsideration re 4 Order, #5 Order Dismissing Case by Carlos Silva. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Court Order)(Demissie, Derege) |
Filing 5 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE(PSSA, 5) |
Filing 4 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. "The Petition is DENIED. See Silva v. Garland, 27 F.4th 95 (1st Cir. 2022)"(PSSA, 5) |
Filing 3 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. Referred for: Full Pretrial, No Dispositive Motions (ptn). (Maynard, Timothy) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 1 Emergency PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Fee status: IFP requested., filed by Carlos Silva.(Demissie, Derege) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.