Evangelist et al v. State of Oregon et al
| Caery Evangelist, Ph.D. and Brian J Els, Ph.D. |
| State of Oregon and Progress Software Corporation |
| 1:2023cv12607 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Allison D Burroughs |
| Other Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MDL CASE CLOSED, Evangelist et al v. State of Oregon et al. In Re: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL 3083. (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 12 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. In view of the letter request and attached voluntary dismissal, [ECF No. #11 ], this case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 11 Letter/request (non-motion) from Brian Simmonds Marshall, Senior Assistant Attorney General . (Marshall, Brian) |
| Filing 10 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. MDL Order No. 1 (General Provisions) (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL: Pursuant to CTO Number 8 entered in MDL No. 3083, District of Oregon case number 6:23-cv-01532-MC has been transferred to the District of Massachusetts and assigned civil action number: 1:23-cv-12607-ADB. In Re: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL 3083 (Belpedio, Lisa) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. (Belpedio, Lisa) |
| Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Oregon; Case Number 6:23-cv-01532. |
Filing 6
ORDER: Transferring this case to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Pursuant to MDL 3083. Certified on 10/31/2023 by Deputy Clerk Lisa Belpedio of the District of Massachusetts. (dsg)
|
| Filing 5 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-8) finalized on 10/31/2023. As stipulated in Rule 7.1(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to oppose the transfer. The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the order is directed to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Massachusetts for filing. The Panel governing statute, 28 U.S.C. 1407, requires that the transferee clerk transmit a certified copy of the Panel order to transfer to the clerk of the district court from which the action is being transferred. Signed by Clerk of the Panel Tiffaney D. Pete on 10/31/2023. (dsg) |
| Filing 4 Stipulated Motion for Stay . Filed by Progress Software Corporation. (Todaro, Anthony) |
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael J. McShane and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 2/16/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 3/18/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 3/18/2024. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (jw)
|
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Progress Software Corporation. (Todaro, Anthony) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 23CV34800 from Marion County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9121179 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Progress Software Corporation (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A). (Todaro, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
