Tucker v. Progress Software Corporation
Reina Tucker |
Progress Software Corporation |
1:2023cv12610 |
October 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Allison D Burroughs |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ELECTRONIC NOTICE: Remote access to todays hearing will be made available to the media and public for viewing purposes only. In order to gain access to the hearing, you must sign up at the following address: #https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html.For questions regarding access to hearings, you may refer to the general orders and public notices of the Court available on #www.mad.uscourts.gov or contact #media@mad.uscourts.gov.Status Conference set for 11/30/2023 02:00 PM in Courtroom 17 (In person only with remote viewing available) before Judge Allison D. Burroughs. Associated Cases: 1:23-md-03083-ADB et al.(McManus, Caetlin) |
Filing 10 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. MDL Order No. 1 (General Provisions) (McManus, Caetlin) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL: Pursuant to CTO Number 1 entered in MDL No. 3083, Eastern District of Louisiana case number 2:23-cv-04980-JTM-MBN has been transferred to the District of Massachusetts and assigned civil action number: 1:23-cv-12610-ADB. In Re: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL 3083 (Belpedio, Lisa) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. (Belpedio, Lisa) |
Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Louisiana Eastern; Case Number 2:23-cv-04980. |
Filing 6 Order of MDL Transfer to District of Massachusetts. MDL case number is 3083. Electronic file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter)(am) |
Filing 5 Notice of Conditional Transfer Order from MDL Panel regarding MDL 3083. (am) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Judical Panel on Multidistrict Litigation re related action. (lag) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Progress Software Corporation. (am) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (kls) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Progress Software Corporation (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-10121615) filed by Reina Tucker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Reagan Charleston Thomas added to party Reina Tucker(pty:pla).(Thomas, Reagan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tucker v. Progress Software Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Reina Tucker | |
Represented By: | Reagan Charleston Thomas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Progress Software Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.