ecobee Technologies ULC v. Jackson Systems, LLC
ecobee Technologies ULC |
Jackson Systems, LLC and Jackson Systems, LLC doing business as HVAC Surplus Store |
1:2023cv12682 |
November 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Denise J Casper |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 REPORT ON THE TERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING TRADEMARK. (Currie, Haley) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ecobee Technologies ULC (Nickerson, Morgan) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Quilter, Madison) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. (Horvath, Courtney) |
Filing 2 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING PATENT OR TRADEMARK. (Nickerson, Morgan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jackson Systems, LLC Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-10122665 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by ecobee Technologies ULC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Nickerson, Morgan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.