Gorman v. Progress Software Corporation et al
Matthew Gorman |
Progress Software Corporation, Sovos Compliance, LLC and Midland States Bank |
1:2023cv12972 |
December 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Allison D Burroughs |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph M. Lyon on behalf of Matthew Gorman (Lyon, Joseph) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Scott Goldenberg on behalf of Matthew Gorman (Goldenberg, Jeffrey) |
Filing 14 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. MDL Order No. 1 (General Provisions)See MDL Master Docket 23-md-3083 for all subsequent procedural orders. (McManus, Caetlin) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles E. Schaffer on behalf of Matthew Gorman (Schaffer, Charles) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Sean R. Matt on behalf of Matthew Gorman (Matt, Sean) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristen Anne Johnson on behalf of Matthew Gorman (Johnson, Kristen) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL: Pursuant to CTO Number 15 entered in MDL No. 3083, Northern District of Illinois case number 3:23-cv-50397 has been transferred to the District of Massachusetts and assigned civil action number: 1:23-cv-12972. In Re: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL 3083 (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of Illinois Northern; Case Number 3:23-cv-50397. |
Filing 7 TRANSFERRED to the District of Massachusetts the electronic record. (jp, ) |
Filing 6 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from MDL Panel transferring case to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts MDL 3083. Mailed notice (jp, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Matthew Gorman as to Sovos Compliance, LLC on 11/7/2023, answer due 11/28/2023. (Kurowski, Daniel) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Matthew Gorman as to Midland States Bank on 11/3/2023, answer due 11/24/2023. (Kurowski, Daniel) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Matthew Gorman by Daniel J. Kurowski (Kurowski, Daniel) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kurowski, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Matthew Gorman; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21289052. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Kurowski, Daniel) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Midland States Bank, Progress Software Corporation, Sovos Compliance, LLC (mcp, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (pg, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Case assignment: Random assignment.. (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.