Kerr v. City of Attleboro
Plaintiff: Andrew John Kew and Pro se litigant Andrew John Kerr
Defendant: City of Attleboro
Case Number: 1:2023cv13045
Filed: December 11, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Nathaniel M Gorton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2024 Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT by Andrew John Kerr. (Kerr, Andrew) Modified on 1/31/2024: corrected docket text to properly reflect document filed (Kelly, Danielle).
January 8, 2024 Filing 6 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. 1. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is ALLOWED. 2. The motion to hold hearings remotely #4 is ALLOWED, subject to reconsideration. 3. If Kerr wishes to pursue this action, he must, within 28 days, file an amended complaint. 4. The motion for leave to file electronically #3 is ALLOWED, Kerr complies with all requirements for electronic filing in the District of Massachusetts, including the following: a. Kerr must have an individual PACER account to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. If Kerr does not have a PACER account, he must obtain one by visiting https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. b. Kerr must contact Tracy McLaughlin (tracy_mclaughlin@mad.uscourts.gov) to obtain access to file electronically through the Courts Case Management/Electronic Case Files ("CM/ECF") system. c. Kerr must follow this District's instructions for pro se litigants filing electronically may be found at https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-se.htm. (PSSA, 3)
December 11, 2023 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Cook, Savannah)
December 11, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION zoom hearing by Andrew John Kerr.(Castilla, Francis)
December 11, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to file electronically Pro Se by Andrew John Kerr.(Castilla, Francis)
December 11, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andrew John Kerr.(Castilla, Francis)
December 11, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Attleboro, filed by Andrew John Kerr.(Castilla, Francis)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kerr v. City of Attleboro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew John Kew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pro se litigant Andrew John Kerr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Attleboro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?