Brown v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
| Donald L Brown |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
| 1:2023cv13053 |
| December 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| F Dennis Saylor |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re ECF No. 6, Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. On December 19, 2023, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs claims are identical to those dismissed by this court in another case involving the same parties (No. 22-11298), and, alternatively, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The deadline to respond to that motion was January 2, 2024. Plaintiff failed to file any opposition by that deadline, and has yet to do so. In light of his pro se status, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause in writing by February 29, 2024, why this case should not be dismissed. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of the action without further notice.(de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 8 STATE COURT Record JPMorgan Chase & Co. summons served on 1/9/2024, answer due 1/30/2024.. (Vigil, Norman) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by JPMorgan Chase & Co.. (Jusczyk, Michael) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by JPMorgan Chase & Co..(Jusczyk, Michael) |
| Filing 5 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by JPMorgan Chase & Co.. (Jusczyk, Michael) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by JPMorgan Chase & Co. Certification of Related Cases Pursuant to Local Rule 40.1(G)(5)(B) (Jusczyk, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JPMorgan Chase & Co. ( Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-10172697 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Civil Cover Sheet, #15 Category Form)(Jusczyk, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Donald L Brown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JPMorgan Chase & Co. | |
| Represented By: | Michael E. Jusczyk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
