Depoian v. Berger
| Sarah Depoian |
| Merle Berger |
| 1:2023cv13063 |
| December 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Richard G Stearns |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam B Wolf on behalf of Sarah Depoian (Wolf, Adam) |
| Filing 8 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #7 Assented to Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Adam B. Wolf. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 7 Assented to MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Adam B. Wolf Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10194975 by Sarah Depoian. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Exhibit A)(Bliss, Paula) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Sarah Depoian. Merle Berger waiver sent on 12/15/2023, answer due 2/13/2024. (Bliss, Paula) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory Robert Browne on behalf of Merle Berger (Browne, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ian J. Pinta on behalf of Merle Berger (Pinta, Ian) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Cowan, Nicole) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Phillips, Sophie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merle Berger Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-10173933 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Sarah Depoian. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Bliss, Paula) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Depoian v. Berger | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sarah Depoian | |
| Represented By: | Paula S. Bliss |
| Represented By: | Adam B Wolf |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Merle Berger | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Robert Browne |
| Represented By: | Ian J. Pinta |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
