Howell v. Watertown Public Library et al
| Curtis Howell |
| Watertown Public Library and Watertown Police Department |
| 1:2023cv13140 |
| December 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| William G Young |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Objection / request for correction of the docket sheet by Curtis Howell. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 6 Request Access to Courts for 15 blank summonses from Curtis Howell. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 5 Request to Receive rulings to email address, Request not to have Magistrate Judge nor Angel Kelly due to disciplinary action complaint from Curtis Howell. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 4 Request for Access to Courts (Court forms, blank summonses with seal and clerk signature, copy of docket sheet) from Curtis Howell. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge William G. Young assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Cowan, Nicole) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Curtis Howell.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Curtis Howell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
