Cherkassky v. Standard BioTools, Inc. et al
| Alexander Y Cherkassky |
| Standard BioTools, Inc. and Michael Egholm |
| 1:2023cv13163 |
| December 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Patti B Saris |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 DECLARATION re #13 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation (Jennifer B. Rubin) by Michael Egholm, Standard BioTools, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Droumbakis, Kathryn) |
| Filing 15 DECLARATION re #13 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation (Keren Croitoru) by Michael Egholm, Standard BioTools, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Droumbakis, Kathryn) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support re #13 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation filed by Michael Egholm, Standard BioTools, Inc.. (Droumbakis, Kathryn) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation by Michael Egholm, Standard BioTools, Inc..(Droumbakis, Kathryn) |
| Filing 12 Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWED re #11 Assented to Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. ANSWER DUE BY 2/14/1024. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
| Filing 11 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , Move Against, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Michael Egholm, Standard BioTools, Inc..(Droumbakis, Kathryn) |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Standard BioTools, Inc.. (Droumbakis, Kathryn) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn R. Droumbakis on behalf of Michael Egholm, Standard BioTools, Inc. (Droumbakis, Kathryn) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by John F. Sylvia on behalf of Michael Egholm, Standard BioTools, Inc. (Sylvia, John) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Standard BioTools, Inc. served on 12/26/2023, answer due 1/16/2024. (McCauley, Melanie) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Michael Egholm served on 12/21/2023, answer due 1/11/2024. (McCauley, Melanie) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Michael Egholm, Standard BioTools, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Phillips, Sophie) |
| Filing 3 Docket entry modified on 12/21/2023 - (Proposed) Summons as to Standard BioTools, Inc. filed by Alexander Y Cherkassky SEE SUMMONS ISSUED, Docket No. #5 . (McCauley, Melanie) (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde). |
| Filing 2 Docket entry modified on 12/21/2023 - (Proposed) Summons as to Michael Egholm filed by Alexander Y Cherkassky. SEE SUMMONS ISSUED, Docket No. #5 . (McCauley, Melanie) (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number BMADC-10188340 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Alexander Y Cherkassky. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(McCauley, Melanie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
