Mohamud v. Bent et al
Plaintiff: Abdulahi Fodey Mohamud
Defendant: William Bill Bent and Antony Blinkin
Case Number: 1:2023cv13228
Filed: December 29, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: William G Young
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael P. Sady on behalf of William Bill Bent, Antony Blinkin (Sady, Michael)
January 17, 2024 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed William Bill Bent served on 1/17/2024, answer due 3/4/2024; Antony Blinkin served on 1/8/2024, answer due 3/4/2024. (Goldstein, Joshua)
January 17, 2024 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney by Abdulahi Fodey Mohamud. William Bill Bent served on 1/3/2024, answer due 3/4/2024; Antony Blinkin served on 1/3/2024, answer due 3/4/2024. (Goldstein, Joshua)
December 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (Dore, Samantha)
December 29, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to William Bill Bent, Antony Blinkin. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Dore, Samantha)
December 29, 2023 Filing 3 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (Dore, Samantha)
December 29, 2023 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge William G. Young assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Cook, Savannah)
December 29, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANTONY BLINKEN, William Bill Bent Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-10196833 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Abdulahi Fodey Mohamud. (Attachments: #1 Category Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(Goldstein, Joshua)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mohamud v. Bent et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abdulahi Fodey Mohamud
Represented By: Joshua L. Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Bill Bent
Represented By: Michael P. Sady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antony Blinkin
Represented By: Michael P. Sady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?