Vaiano v. The Vanguard Group, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: VINCENT VAIANO
Defendant: The Vanguard Group, Inc., Synchrony Financial and Synchrony Bank
Case Number: 1:2024cv10004
Filed: January 2, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Leo T Sorokin
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2024 Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Support of Opposition re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Counts Six through Fifteen of Plaintiff's Complaint) filed by Vincent Vaiano. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Dore, Samantha) (Main Document 17 replaced on 2/28/2024) (Dore, Samantha).
February 9, 2024 Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Vincent Vaiano (Dore, Samantha)
February 7, 2024 Filing 15 Return receipt received for mail sent to Vincent Vaiano Delivered on 2/5/2024 (Dore, Samantha)
February 5, 2024 Filing 14 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered: re #13 Letter/request (non-motion) from April M. Garbuz. Vanguard was named as a defendant in this action when it was filed in state court. Prior to service on Vanguard, this action was removed to federal court by the other defendant on January 2, 2024. On January 16, 2024, the state court received from Plaintiff a voluntary stipulation of dismissal with prejudice of Vanguard because it was wrongfully named in the lawsuit. Doc. No 11 at 5. This document appears in the official record of the case file from state court which was received by this court on January 24, 2024. In these circumstances, Vanguards request that this Court dismiss with prejudice Vanguard from this action, Doc. No. 13, is ALLOWED. (Dore, Samantha)
February 2, 2024 Filing 13 Letter/request (non-motion) from April M. Garbuz . (Garbuz, April)
January 31, 2024 Filing 12 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TODISMISS BY FEBRUARY 20, 2024 (Dore, Samantha)
January 24, 2024 Filing 11 STATE COURT Record. (Dore, Samantha)
January 24, 2024 Filing 10 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered: re #8 MOTION to Stay Discovery. This Motion is ALLOWED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to de novo review of the issue if Plaintiff files a response to the motion within fourteen days. The Court notes however that in federal court discovery ordinarily does not commence until after both resolution of motions to dismiss and the convening of the Rule 16 scheduling conference (Dore, Samantha)
January 23, 2024 Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Stay Discovery filed by Synchrony Bank. (Casale, David)
January 23, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION to Stay Discovery by Synchrony Bank. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Casale, David)
January 23, 2024 Filing 7 Disclosure pursuant to Rule 26 by Synchrony Bank.(Casale, David)
January 9, 2024 Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Counts Six through Fifteen of Plaintiff's Complaint) filed by Synchrony Bank. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Casale, David)
January 9, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Counts Six through Fifteen of Plaintiff's Complaint) by Synchrony Bank.(Casale, David)
January 9, 2024 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Synchrony Bank identifying Corporate Parent Synchrony Financial for Synchrony Bank.. (Casale, David)
January 3, 2024 Filing 3 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by mail (Barbosa, Nilsa)
January 3, 2024 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Phillips, Sophie)
January 2, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Synchrony Bank ( Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-10199602 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. St. Ct. Complaint, #2 Category Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Casale, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vaiano v. The Vanguard Group, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VINCENT VAIANO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Vanguard Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Synchrony Financial
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Synchrony Bank
Represented By: David Alan Casale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?