IOT Technologies LLC v. Savant Systems, Inc.
IOT TECHNOLOGIES LLC |
SAVANT SYSTEMS, INC. |
1:2024cv10037 |
January 4, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Angel Kelley |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Support re #15 First MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to 35 USC 101 filed by Savant Systems, Inc.. (Attaya, Michael) |
Filing 15 First MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to 35 USC 101 by Savant Systems, Inc..(Attaya, Michael) |
Filing 14 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered GRANTING #13 Assented to Motion for Extension of Time to March 1, 2024 to Respond to #1 Complaint. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 13 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to March 1, 2024 to respond to complaint by Savant Systems, Inc..(Attaya, Michael) Modified ECF event on 1/22/2024. (Pacho, Arnold). |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael E. Attaya on behalf of Savant Systems, Inc. (Attaya, Michael) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by James F. McDonough, III on behalf of IOT Technologies LLC (McDonough, James) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan L. Hardt on behalf of IOT Technologies LLC (Hardt, Jonathan) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Carey Matthew Rozier on behalf of IOT Technologies LLC (Rozier, Carey) |
Filing 8 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered GRANTING #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Added Carey Matthew Rozier, Jonathan Lloyd Hardt, and James F. McDonough, III. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Carey Matthew Rozier, Jonathan Lloyd Hardt and James F. McDonough, III Filing fee: $ 375, receipt number AMADC-10215708 by IOT Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Rozier Certificate, #2 Hardt Certificate, #3 McDonough Certificate)(Godkin, David) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by James E. Kruzer on behalf of IOT Technologies LLC (Kruzer, James) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Cowan, Nicole) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Angel Kelley assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Cook, Savannah) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by IOT TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Godkin, David) |
Filing 2 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING PATENT OR TRADEMARK. (Godkin, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SAVANT SYSTEMS, INC. Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-10204430 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by IOT TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Category Form)(Godkin, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.