Vitaly Borker v. Warden Bowers
Petitioner: Vitaly Borker
Respondent: Warden Bowers
Case Number: 1:2024cv10045
Filed: January 5, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Leo T Sorokin
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 29, 2024 Filing 13 Reply to Government's Response filed by Vitaly Borker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Dore, Samantha)
February 16, 2024 Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Amber Bourke in Support re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Warden Bowers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit Exhibit K)(Fitzgerald, Michael)
February 16, 2024 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Warden Bowers. (Fitzgerald, Michael)
February 16, 2024 Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Warden Bowers.(Fitzgerald, Michael)
January 26, 2024 Filing 9 Copy re 8 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer mailed to Vitaly Borker on 1/26/2024. (Dore, Samantha)
January 26, 2024 Filing 8 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered: re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to February 16, 2024to File Answer or Other Response to the Petition. ALLOWED. (Dore, Samantha)
January 25, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to February 16, 2024 to File Answer or Other Response to the Petition by Warden Bowers.(Fitzgerald, Michael)
January 25, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Fitzgerald on behalf of Warden Bowers (Fitzgerald, Michael)
January 19, 2024 Filing 5 Filing fee/payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 100006248 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) (Phillips, Sophie)
January 12, 2024 Filing 4 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. The answer or responsive pleading is due no later than February 2, 2024. (PSSA, 3)
January 12, 2024 Filing 3 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. Procedural Order regarding resolution of filing fee. Plaintiff must respond within 21 days. (Castilla, Francis)
January 5, 2024 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Cook, Savannah)
January 5, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), filed by Vitaly Broker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Cowan, Nicole)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vitaly Borker v. Warden Bowers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Vitaly Borker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Bowers
Represented By: Michael Fitzgerald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?