Vitaly Borker v. Warden Bowers
Vitaly Borker |
Warden Bowers |
1:2024cv10045 |
January 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Leo T Sorokin |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Reply to Government's Response filed by Vitaly Borker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Dore, Samantha) |
Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Amber Bourke in Support re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Warden Bowers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit Exhibit K)(Fitzgerald, Michael) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Warden Bowers. (Fitzgerald, Michael) |
Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Warden Bowers.(Fitzgerald, Michael) |
Filing 9 Copy re 8 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer mailed to Vitaly Borker on 1/26/2024. (Dore, Samantha) |
Filing 8 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered: re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to February 16, 2024to File Answer or Other Response to the Petition. ALLOWED. (Dore, Samantha) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to February 16, 2024 to File Answer or Other Response to the Petition by Warden Bowers.(Fitzgerald, Michael) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Fitzgerald on behalf of Warden Bowers (Fitzgerald, Michael) |
Filing 5 Filing fee/payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 100006248 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) (Phillips, Sophie) |
Filing 4 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. The answer or responsive pleading is due no later than February 2, 2024. (PSSA, 3) |
Filing 3 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. Procedural Order regarding resolution of filing fee. Plaintiff must respond within 21 days. (Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Cook, Savannah) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), filed by Vitaly Broker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Cowan, Nicole) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vitaly Borker v. Warden Bowers | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Vitaly Borker | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Bowers | |
Represented By: | Michael Fitzgerald |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.