Mercado v. Coleman Murphy et al
| Leslie Mercado |
| Doris Coleman Murphy and Guy Harold Harris, 3rd |
| 1:2024cv10046 |
| January 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Richard G Stearns |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE(PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 4 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (PSSA, 4) (Main Document 4 replaced on 2/6/2024) (PSSA, 4). |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Cook, Savannah) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Leslie Mercado.(Castilla, Francis) (Main Document 2 replaced on 1/5/2024) (Castilla, Francis). (Main Document 2 replaced on 1/5/2024) (Castilla, Francis). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Leslie Mercado. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Category Form)(Castilla, Francis) (Main Document 1 replaced on 1/5/2024) (Castilla, Francis). (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/5/2024) (Castilla, Francis). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
