Smith v. Alves
| Craig Smith |
| Nelson Alves |
| 1:2024cv10124 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Denise J Casper |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWING #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to April 9, 2024 to File Answer or Responsive Pleading to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.Answer due 4/9/2024. (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to April 9, 2024 to File Answer or Responsive Pleading to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Nelson Alves.(Blume, Todd) Modified docketing event on 2/23/2024 (de Oliveira, Flaviana). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Todd M. Blume on behalf of Nelson Alves (Blume, Todd) |
| Filing 7 Copy re #6 Service Order - 2254 Petition and docket sheet, mailed to Petitioner on 1/19/2024. Copy of #6 Service Order, #1 Petition, #2 Memorandum of Law, and docket sheet mailed to respondent Nelson Alves (MCI-Norfolk), and to the Massachusetts Attorney General on 1/19/2024. (Horvath, Courtney) |
| Filing 6 Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2254 Petition. Order entered pursuant to R.4 of the Rules governing Section 2254 cases for service on respondents. Answer/responsive pleading due w/in 21 days of receipt of this order. (Horvath, Courtney) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee/payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 100006249 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Phillips, Sophie) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (Cook, Savannah) |
| Filing 3 Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Exceed The Page Limit by Craig Smith. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Of Petitioner in Support of Motion)(Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM In Support by Craig Smith in re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). (Attachments: #1 Appendix to Petition and Memorandum In Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254)(Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254, filed by Craig Smith. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(Kelly, Danielle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Alves | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Craig Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Nelson Alves | |
| Represented By: | Todd M. Blume |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
