Nickens v. Covidien LP et al
| Benjamin Nickens |
| Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS |
| 1:2024cv10360 |
| February 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Patti B Saris |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Covidien LP, Sofradim Production SAS. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF MDL CASE OPENED, Direct file in the District of Massachusetts; 1:24-cv-10360-PBS Nickens v. Covidien LP et al. In Re: Covidien Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation No. II, MDL 3029. (Cook, Savannah) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. (Cook, Savannah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-10270266 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Benjamin Nickens. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Crowell, Ashley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
