Dickson v. Buyers Products Company et al
| Shawn Dickson |
| VT Leeboy, Inc., Buyers Products Company and William F. Pierce, Jr. |
| 1:2024cv10519 |
| February 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Nathaniel M Gorton |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 First REPLY to Response to #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Shawn Dickson. (Santoro, Victoria) |
| Filing 14 Joint Opposition re #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Buyers Products Company, VT Leeboy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration Of Dain Anderson)(Riley, Richard) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Devine on behalf of VT Leeboy, Inc. (Devine, Robert) |
| Filing 12 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWING #9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Robert G. Devine, Esq. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at # https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number under ADDITIONAL FILER INFORMATION on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Shawn Dickson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-G)(Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Shawn Dickson. (Attachments: # REFER TO ENTRY #11 Memo to Motion to Remand, # REFER TO ENTRY [11-1] Exhibit Exhibits A-G)(Santoro, Victoria) Modified on 3/29/2024: Removed memorandum in support and exhibits to properly file in separate entry (Kelly, Danielle). |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Robert G. Devine, Esq. Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10341554 by VT Leeboy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Robert G. Devine, Esq.)(Keough, Timothy) |
| Filing 8 STATE COURT Record. (Kober, Peter) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradford E. Curtis on behalf of Buyers Products Company (Curtis, Bradford) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy J. Keough on behalf of VT Leeboy, Inc. (Keough, Timothy) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard J. Riley on behalf of Buyers Products Company (Riley, Richard) |
| Filing 4 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter C. Kober on behalf of Buyers Products Company (Kober, Peter) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Phillips, Sophie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Buyers Products Company Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-10293909 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, #3 Exhibit)(Kober, Peter) Modified on 2/29/2024: corrected docket text (Kelly, Danielle). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
