Mortland v. Nstar Electric Company
Derek Mortland |
Nstar Electric Company |
1:2024cv10578 |
March 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Angel Kelley |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NSTAR Electric Company ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Nstar Electric Company.(Callahan, Michael) |
Filing 7 District Judge Angel Kelley: STANDING ORDER REGARDING MOTION PRACTICE entered. (Horvath, Courtney) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Nstar Electric Company served on 3/14/2024, answer due 4/4/2024. (Meeker, Colin) |
Filing 5 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Colin G. Meeker. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Nstar Electric Company. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Kinsella, Jaylannie) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Angel Kelley assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Phillips, Sophie) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Colin G. Meeker Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10306199 by Derek Mortland. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration in Support of Request for Admission, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Garno, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nstar Electric Company Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-10306162 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Derek Mortland. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Summons, #3 Category Form)(Garno, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mortland v. Nstar Electric Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Derek Mortland | |
Represented By: | Edward N. Garno |
Represented By: | Colin G. Meeker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nstar Electric Company | |
Represented By: | Michael K. Callahan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.