Gamble Williams v. Boston Police Department et al
| Theodore Gamble Williams |
| Boston Police Department, Boston Police Officer John Doe and Boston Police Jane Doe |
| 1:2024cv10701 |
| March 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Patti B Saris |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Copy ECF#4 and IFP Form mailed to Theodore Gamble Williams #W117585 Old Colony Correctional Center 1 Administration Road Bridgewater MA 02324 on 3-20-24. (Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 4 Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. Procedural Order regarding resolution of filling fee. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff must respond within 21 days. (Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Cook, Savannah) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Theodore Gamble Williams.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Theodore Gamble Williams.(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
