Eric E. Eufusia v. Medical Eye Services, Inc.
Eric E. Eufusia |
Medical Eye Services, Inc. doing business as MesVision |
1:2024cv10844 |
April 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Allison D Burroughs |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL: Pursuant to CTO Number 35 entered in MDL No. 3083, Central District of California case number 8:24-cv-00432 has been transferred to the District of Massachusetts and assigned civil action number: 1:24-cv-10844. In Re: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL 3083 (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 11 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 10 Case transferred in from District of California Central; Case Number 8:24-cv-00432. |
Filing 9 Conditional Transfer Order - 35 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 3083, transferring case to USDC, District of Massachusetts and assigned to Honorable Allison D. Burroughs. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb) |
Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 4/15/2024 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (See attached Order for complete details.) (kdu) |
Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Eric E. Eufusia in Orange County Superior Court on 12/21/2023, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Medical Eye Services, Inc., identifying EssilorLuxottica USA Inc. and EssilorLuxottica SA. (Cutts, Kyle) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Medical Eye Services, Inc.. (Cutts, Kyle) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from California Superior Court, County of Orange, case number 30-2023-01369472-CU-CO-CXC Receipt No: ACACDC-37013484 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Medical Eye Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Kyle T. Cutts added to party Medical Eye Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Cutts, Kyle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Eric E. Eufusia v. Medical Eye Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Eric E. Eufusia | |
Represented By: | Natalie A. Lyons |
Represented By: | Vess Allen Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Medical Eye Services, Inc. doing business as MesVision | |
Represented By: | Kyle T. Cutts |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.