Robertson v. Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc.
| Dale Robertson |
| Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv10970 |
| April 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Denise J Casper |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. ORDER Consolidating Cases, Approval of Selection of Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and Change of Case Name. Member Case: 1:24-cv-10970-DJC. DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. ALL FILINGS TO BE MADE IN LEAD CASE 1:24-cv-10797-DJC.(Cook, Savannah) |
| Filing 8 Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #7 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint until 30 days after a consolidated complaint is filed, if the motion to consolidate is granted; or 60 days after the motion to consolidate is denied. (Hourihan, Lisa) |
| Filing 7 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc..(Daly, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Wystan M. Ackerman on behalf of Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc. (Ackerman, Wystan) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin P. Daly on behalf of Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc. (Daly, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc. served on 4/25/2024, answer due 5/16/2024. (Kassan, Randi) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (Cowan, Nicole) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc. Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-10366846 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Dale Robertson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, #3 Proposed Summons)(Kassan, Randi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robertson v. Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dale Robertson | |
| Represented By: | Randi A. Kassan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kevin P. Daly |
| Represented By: | Wystan M. Ackerman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
