United States of America v. Pena
| United States of America |
| Eva Pena |
| 1:2024cv11061 |
| April 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Julia E Kobick |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Copy re #9 Consent Decree and Final Judgment, 8 Clerk's Notes and docket sheet mailed to Eva Pena on 5/17/2024. (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 9 District Judge Julia E. Kobick: CONSENT DECREE AND FINAL JUDGMENT entered. (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 8 Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before District Judge Julia E. Kobick: Hearing held on 5/17/2024 by video conference.Case called. The Court informs the parties it has a few questions regarding the consent decree. The Court confirms with the defendant that the government has filed a complaint against her and breaks down the complaint to make sure she understands the complaint. The government confirms the outline the Court provided to the defendant of the complaint is correct as alleged. The government states its main goal is to stop the conduct of Ms. Pena. The Defendant confirms she signed the stipulation #2 on March 18, 2024, and the Court reviews the stipulations to make sure the defendant understands what she agreed to in the consent decree. The Defendant states she has no further questions if the Court endorses the consent decree. The Court asks the government about the consequences of not complying with the consent decree. The government states it did not set out consequences of non-compliance in the decree itself, but in the letters the defendant has previously received, the possible consequences were laid out including civil contempt, request potentially more stringent monitoring conditions on bank accounts and potentially criminal contempt if warranted. The Court will endorse the Consent Decree and will file it on the docket. The government confirms a postal inspector will serve a copy of the consent decree in person to the defendant. (Court Reporter: Jessica Leonard at jessica.bewsee@gmail.com.)(Attorneys present: Ann Entwistle and Carol Head for the Plaintiff. Ms. Eva Pena for herself as the Defendant. Postal Inspector Lauren Vumbaco.) (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Ann F. Entwistle on behalf of United States of America (Entwistle, Ann) |
| Filing 6 Copy re 5 Notice of Hearing mailed to Eva Pena on 5/8/2024. (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Hearing.This hearing will be conducted by video conference. Counsel of record will receive a video conference invite at the email registered in CM/ECF. If you have technical or compatibility issues with the technology, please notify the courtroom deputy of the session as soon as possible.Audio access to the hearing may be available to the media and public. Please check the #Court schedule. In order to gain access to the hearing, you must sign up at the following address: #https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html.For questions regarding access to hearings, you may refer to the general orders and public notices of the Court available on #www.mad.uscourts.gov or contact media@mad.uscourts.gov.Hearing re Consent Decree set for 5/17/2024 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (Remote only) before District Judge Julia E. Kobick. (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Eva Pena. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Phillips, Sophie) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Julia E. Kobick assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (Cook, Savannah) |
| Filing 2 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint Entry of Consent Decree and Final Judgment by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Head, Carol) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/22/2024: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Kelly, Danielle). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Permanent Injunction against Eva Pena (Fee Status: US Government), filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, # Text of Proposed Order)(Head, Carol) Modified on 4/22/2024: Removed proposed order to properly file with stipulation - See Entry #2 (Kelly, Danielle). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Pena | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Carol E. Head |
| Represented By: | Ann F. Entwistle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eva Pena | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
