Kingston v. Strange et al
| Aimee Kingston |
| Dottie Fulginiti, Deborah Balcarek, Peter Deschenes, Gregory Strange, Frank Caridi, The Town of Easton Massachusetts Department of Town Administrator, Amos Keddem, The Town of Easton Massachusetts Planning & Economic Development, The Town of Easton Massachusetts Planning and Zoning Board, Christopher Anderson, Kevin Greiner, The Town of Easton, Massachusetts, Connor Read, Robert Stetson, The Town of Easton Massachusetts Inspectional Services, Stephanie Danielson, The Town of Easton Massachusetts Building Department and The Town of Easton Massachusetts Select Board |
| 1:2024cv12021 |
| August 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to file electronically Pro Se by Aimee Kingston.(Cowan, Nicole) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Aimee Kingston. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit, #17 Exhibit, #18 Exhibit, #19 Exhibit, #20 Exhibit, #21 Exhibit)(Cowan, Nicole) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
