Latham Jr. v. Ress
| Lincoln G. Latham Jr. |
| William Hunt Ress |
| 1:2024cv12137 |
| August 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| F Dennis Saylor |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Sequester a Suspect Against Defendant by Lincoln G. Latham Jr..(de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 12 Complaint to Abolish Eviction Against Defendant. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter). (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Establishing a Budget Against Defendant by Lincoln G. Latham Jr. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter). (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Assess Financial Data Against Defendant by Lincoln G. Latham Jr. (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against William Hunt Ress, filed by Lincoln G. Latham Jr..(de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lincoln G. Latham Jr. (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Certified Account by Lincoln G. Latham Jr.(de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 6 Copy mailed Order #5 to: Lincoln G. Latham Jr. 152 Bittersweet Lane Apartment 350 Randolph, MA 02368 on 8-27-24. (Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 5 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. 1.If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he must by September 25, 2024 (1) either pay the $405 filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and (2) file an amended complaint that asserts a basis for this Court's subject matter jurisdiction and states a plausible claim for relief.2.The motion for discovery is DENIED.3.Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will likely result in the dismissal of this action. (PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 4 Plaintiff's Motion for Funds by Lincoln G. Latham Jr. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter). (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Discovery by Lincoln G. Latham Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter and Envelope). (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jessica D. Hedges. (Kinsella, Jaylannie) |
| Filing 1 Plaintiff's COMPLAINT for Restraining-Order [Issued Pursuant to 5th Amendment of U.S. Constitution] against William Hunt Ress, filed by Lincoln G. Latham Jr. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(Currie, Haley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Latham Jr. v. Ress | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: William Hunt Ress | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lincoln G. Latham Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
