Morgan v. Orlov et al
| Kristie Morgan |
| Vasiliy Orlov and DoorDash, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv13190 |
| December 27, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Leo T Sorokin |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered: re #18 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply. ALLOWED. No further briefing on this motion. In the future counsel shall comply with the conferred requirements of Local Rule 7.1 on each motion. (SED) |
| Filing 19 SUR-REPLY to Motion re #18 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand filed by DoorDash, Inc.. (Signoracci, Anthony) |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply by DoorDash, Inc..(Signoracci, Anthony) |
| Filing 17 BRIEF by Kristie Morgan Plaintiff's Reply Brief to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. (Baldwin, Carleigh) |
| Filing 16 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. New Civil Cases General Procedural ORDER. (FGD) |
| Filing 15 Opposition re #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Vasiliy Orlov, DoorDash, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" Plaintiff's Original Complaint, #2 Exhibit "B" DoorDash Request for Admission, #3 Exhibit "C" Correspondence Re: Service, #4 Exhibit "D" Plaintiff's Response to DoorDash, #5 Exhibit "E" Doordash Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit "F" Doordash Corporate Disclosure, #7 Exhibit "G" Civil Cover Sheet)(Brosnihan, David) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Geoffrey M. Coan on behalf of Vasiliy Orlov (Coan, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin W. Manganaro on behalf of Vasiliy Orlov (Manganaro, Kevin) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony R. Signoracci on behalf of DoorDash, Inc. (Signoracci, Anthony) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Kristie Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Baldwin, Carleigh) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Carleigh S. Baldwin on behalf of Kristie Morgan (Baldwin, Carleigh) |
| Filing 9 STATE COURT Record All Parties.. (Miano, Samuel) |
| Filing 8 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (Mortellite, Kayla) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Cowan, Nicole) |
| Filing 6 Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet re #5 Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet by DoorDash, Inc.. (Miano, Samuel) |
| Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet by DoorDash, Inc.. (Miano, Samuel) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel shall complete and file in PDF format a Civil Cover Sheet. The form can be found on the court's website under Resources/Forms. Counsel will use the event under Other Documents- Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet.(Mortellite, Kayla) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by DoorDash, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent DoorDash, Inc. for DoorDash, Inc... (Miano, Samuel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by DoorDash, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal (Miano, Samuel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by DoorDash, Inc. ( Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-10765533 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Miano, Samuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
