Xavier Silva v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Leticia Xavier Silva |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Secretary of Homeland Security, Joseph Edlow, Markwayne Mullin and Sarah Kendall |
| 1:2026cv13614 |
| August 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Patti B Saris |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jessica D. Hedges. (MBM) |
| Filing 2 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Leticia Xavier Silva as to All Defendants. (Kalil, Clarissa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR RELIEF UNDER THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1361 against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-11943360 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Leticia Xavier Silva. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Category Form, #4 Exhibits )(Kalil, Clarissa) Modified on 8/7/2026 to remove duplicate docket text (CEH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
