Santana Zoquier v. Westling et al
| Orizon Manuel Santana Zoquier |
| David Westling, Markwayne Mullin, Todd Blanche and Antoine Moniz |
| 1:2026cv13621 |
| August 7, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| William G Young |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (MAP)
|
| Filing 4 Judge William G. Young: ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF PETITION AND STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVALRespondents shall answer or otherwise respond to the petition no later than Friday August 14, 2026. (MAP) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge William G. Young assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jessica D. Hedges. (MBM) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee/payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 100016225 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) (LBO) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), filed by Orizon Manuel Santana Zoquier. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(LBO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
